THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DINESHBHAI BABUBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - D K PARMAR — 38/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 75,352,351(3). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th April 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJBN010023002025
e-Filing Number
12-05-2025
Filing Number
38/2025
Filing Date
14-05-2025
Registration No
38/2025
Registration Date
14-05-2025
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198065250140
Police Station
VALLABHIPUR POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. AGP
Respondent(s)
DINESHBHAI BABUBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - D K PARMAR
HARESHBHAI BABUBHAI VAGHELA
Adv. D K PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 30-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 27-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 24-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Sp. (POCSO) Case No. 38/2025 Court: Special Judge (POCSO) & 3rd Additional Session Judge, Bhavnagar Date of Judgment: 07/04/2026 Accused: Dineshbhai Babubhai Vaghela and Hareshbhai Babubhai Vaghela Charges: Indian Penal Code Sections 75, 352, 351(3) and POCSO Act 2012, Sections 8, 12, 17 Decision: Both accused are ACQUITTED of all charges. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, particularly regarding the victim's age at the time of the alleged offense and the credibility of key witnesses. The court noted insufficient corroborating evidence and gaps in the investigation despite detailed examination of testimonial and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sp. (POCSO) Case No. 38/2025 Court: Special Judge (POCSO) & 3rd Additional Session Judge, Bhavnagar Date of Judgment: 07/04/2026 Accused: Dineshbhai Babubhai Vaghela and Hareshbhai Babubhai Vaghela Charges: Indian Penal Code Sections 75, 352, 351(3) and POCSO Act 2012, Sections 8, 12, 17 Decision: Both accused are ACQUITTED of all charges. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, particularly regarding the victim's age at the time of the alleged offense and the credibility of key witnesses. The court noted insufficient corroborating evidence and gaps in the investigation despite detailed examination of testimonial and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts