RAMDAN JASHUBHAI ALIAS JASKARANDAN GADHVI (MAHIYA) vs EDELWEISS GENERAL INSURANCE CO. — 142/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 105. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJBN010013052026

Filing Number

142/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

142/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

2-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 27-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 105

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMDAN JASHUBHAI ALIAS JASKARANDAN GADHVI (MAHIYA)

    Adv. R V NAVADIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.EDELWEISS GENERAL INSURANCE CO.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Motor Accidents Claims (MAC) Tribunal at Bhavnagar allowed the application filed by Ramdan Jashubhai Gadhvi against Edelweiss General Insurance Company and directed payment of the compensation amount deposited by the insurer, along with accrued interest, to the claimant via bank transfer. The insurance company did not appeal the underlying judgment in MACP No. 10/2023, and its counsel raised no objection to the payment order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Order

    3rd Addl District Judge

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 142/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Motor Accidents Claims (MAC) Tribunal at Bhavnagar allowed the application filed by Ramdan Jashubhai Gadhvi against Edelweiss General Insurance Company and directed payment of the compensation amount deposited by the insurer, along with accrued interest, to the claimant via bank transfer. The insurance company did not appeal the underlying judgment in MACP No. 10/2023, and its counsel raised no objection to the payment order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case