RUMIBHAI KARIMBHAI SHAIKH vs ARISHA BHUVAN JAIN DHARMSHALA TRUST THROUGH ITS TRUSTEE — 27/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,O41. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.
RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: GJBN010012822023
Filing Number
27/2023
Filing Date
28-Mar-2023
Registration No
27/2023
Registration Date
28-Mar-2023
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RUMIBHAI KARIMBHAI SHAIKH
Adv. S H TRIVEDI
Respondent(s)
-
1.ARISHA BHUVAN JAIN DHARMSHALA TRUST THROUGH ITS TRUSTEE
-
2.THE STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
Adv. EX PARTY
-
3.COLLECTOR SHREE,BHAVNAGAR
Adv. EX PARTY
-
4.PALITANA NAGARPALIKA THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER SHREE,
Adv. EX PARTY
-
5.KESHUBHAI JIVABHAI MAKWANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Principal District Judge, Bhavnagar dismissed the appeal filed by Rumibhai Karimbhai Shaikh (a corporator) against the trial court's judgment that allowed the Arisha Bhuvan Jain Dharmshala Trust's suit. The court found the appellant lacked locus standi since he was not an elected member of Palitana Nagarpalika and had himself stated in his written statement that he was not a necessary party. The court confirmed the trial court's decision that the Trust's construction of gates on its private property Survey No.285 was legal, particularly since municipal authorities had previously granted permission for the gates, thereby validating the Trust's actions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-May-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
08-May-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
06-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
15-Apr-2026
Service Of Process
Principal District Judge
-
04-Apr-2026
Service Of Process
Principal District Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
Service Of Process
Principal District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Service Of Process
Principal District Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Service Of Process
Principal District Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Service Of Process
4th Addl District Judge
-
04-Oct-2025
Service Of Process
4th Addl District Judge
-
22-Aug-2025
Service Of Process
4th Addl District Judge
-
26-Jun-2025
Service Of Process
4th Addl District Judge
-
02-May-2025
Service Of Process
3rd Addl District Judge
-
27-Mar-2025
Service Of Process
3rd Addl District Judge
-
23-Jan-2025
Service Of Process
3rd Addl District Judge
-
05-Dec-2024
Service Of Process
3rd Addl District Judge
-
25-Oct-2024
Service Of Process
3rd Addl District Judge
-
03-Oct-2024
Service Of Process
3rd Addl District Judge
-
22-Aug-2024
Service Of Process
3rd Addl District Judge
-
04-Jul-2024
Service Of Process
3rd Addl District Judge
-
17-May-2024
Service Of Process
3rd Addl District Judge
-
27-Feb-2024
Service Of Process
3rd Addl District Judge
-
30-Jan-2024
Service Of Process
3rd Addl District Judge
-
11-Dec-2023
Service Of Process
3rd Addl District Judge
-
26-Oct-2023
Service Of Process
4th Addl District Judge
-
31-Aug-2023
Service Of Process
4th Addl District Judge
-
03-Aug-2023
Service Of Process
4th Addl District Judge
-
17-Jun-2023
Service Of Process
4th Addl District Judge
-
03-May-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 27/2023
Summary The Principal District Judge, Bhavnagar dismissed the appeal filed by Rumibhai Karimbhai Shaikh (a corporator) against the trial court's judgment that allowed the Arisha Bhuvan Jain Dharmshala Trust's suit. The court found the appellant lacked locus standi since he was not an elected member of Palitana Nagarpalika and had himself stated in his written statement that he was not a necessary party. The court confirmed the trial court's decision that the Trust's construction of gates on its private property Survey No.285 was legal, particularly since municipal authorities had previously granted permission for the gates, thereby validating the Trust's actions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts