SAKIRBHAI ALARAKHBHAI SORA vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 466/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBN010012432026
Filing Number
466/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
466/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198068220526
Police Station
BHARATNAGAR POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAKIRBHAI ALARAKHBHAI SORA
Adv. P P JADEJA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP
VASANTBEN WIFE OF NARESHBHAI KARELIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Misc. Application No. 466/2026 Court Decision: The bail application was GRANTED. The court released Sakirbhai Alarakhbhai Sora on bail with a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 and one surety of equal amount, plus Rs. 500 penalty. Key Reasoning: The court found that the applicant's absence during trial resulted from misunderstanding the trial date rather than deliberate misconduct. Since he had previously been granted bail in this POCSO case and was currently in judicial custody on an arrest warrant, the court deemed it appropriate to release him subject to strict conditions requiring regular court attendance, adherence to bail conditions, and non-interference with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Misc. Application No. 466/2026 Court Decision: The bail application was GRANTED. The court released Sakirbhai Alarakhbhai Sora on bail with a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 and one surety of equal amount, plus Rs. 500 penalty. Key Reasoning: The court found that the applicant's absence during trial resulted from misunderstanding the trial date rather than deliberate misconduct. Since he had previously been granted bail in this POCSO case and was currently in judicial custody on an arrest warrant, the court deemed it appropriate to release him subject to strict conditions requiring regular court attendance, adherence to bail conditions, and non-interference with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts