IKBALBHAI AMIRBHAI MADHARA vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 458/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJBN010011452026

Filing Number

458/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

458/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

3-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198065230294

Police Station

VALLABHIPUR POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 15,15(c),29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.IKBALBHAI AMIRBHAI MADHARA

    Adv. M P VYAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: 458/2026 The Court dismissed Iqbalbhai Amirbhai Madhara's temporary bail application in a serious NDPS Act case (Sections 15, 15(C), 29). Although the applicant argued he was the sole earner needed to pay his daughter's college fees and manage family hardship, the court found these reasons non-compelling. The Investigating Officer's report indicated high risk of witness intimidation and law violation if released, outweighing personal hardship claims. The applicant was remanded to District Jail, Bhavnagar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Order

    4th Addl District Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 458/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: 458/2026 The Court dismissed Iqbalbhai Amirbhai Madhara's temporary bail application in a serious NDPS Act case (Sections 15, 15(C), 29). Although the applicant argued he was the sole earner needed to pay his daughter's college fees and manage family hardship, the court found these reasons non-compelling. The Investigating Officer's report indicated high risk of witness intimidation and law violation if released, outweighing personal hardship claims. The applicant was remanded to District Jail, Bhavnagar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case