VISHWADIPSINH ALIAS BHOLU TEMUBHA GOHIL vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 452/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJBN010011302026

Case disposed

Filing Number

452/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

452/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198006252748

Police Station

GHOGHA ROAD POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 115(2),352,351(3),309(4)

Petitioner(s)

VISHWADIPSINH ALIAS BHOLU TEMUBHA GOHIL

Adv. J B GOHIL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP

Hearing History

Judge: 2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

25-03-2026

Disposed

20-03-2026

ORDER

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

SUMMARY The court rejected the regular bail application of Vishwadipsinh alias Bholu Gohil, who was charged under IPC 2023 sections 309(4), 112(2), 332, and 331(3) for allegedly assaulting and robbing ₹3,900 from the complainant. The court found a prima facie case existed, considering the chargesheet had been filed and the prosecution presented sufficient evidence through investigator affidavits. The court declined to grant bail, noting the serious nature of the charges and risks of witness tampering or the accused absconding during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The court rejected the regular bail application of Vishwadipsinh alias Bholu Gohil, who was charged under IPC 2023 sections 309(4), 112(2), 332, and 331(3) for allegedly assaulting and robbing ₹3,900 from the complainant. The court found a prima facie case existed, considering the chargesheet had been filed and the prosecution presented sufficient evidence through investigator affidavits. The court declined to grant bail, noting the serious nature of the charges and risks of witness tampering or the accused absconding during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case