VISHWADIPSINH ALIAS BHOLU TEMUBHA GOHIL vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 452/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBN010011302026
Filing Number
452/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
452/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
2-3rd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198006252748
Police Station
GHOGHA ROAD POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VISHWADIPSINH ALIAS BHOLU TEMUBHA GOHIL
Adv. J B GOHIL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
SUMMARY The court rejected the regular bail application of Vishwadipsinh alias Bholu Gohil, who was charged under IPC 2023 sections 309(4), 112(2), 332, and 331(3) for allegedly assaulting and robbing ₹3,900 from the complainant. The court found a prima facie case existed, considering the chargesheet had been filed and the prosecution presented sufficient evidence through investigator affidavits. The court declined to grant bail, noting the serious nature of the charges and risks of witness tampering or the accused absconding during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Addl District Judge
-
20-Mar-2026
Order
3rd Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 452/2026
SUMMARY The court rejected the regular bail application of Vishwadipsinh alias Bholu Gohil, who was charged under IPC 2023 sections 309(4), 112(2), 332, and 331(3) for allegedly assaulting and robbing ₹3,900 from the complainant. The court found a prima facie case existed, considering the chargesheet had been filed and the prosecution presented sufficient evidence through investigator affidavits. The court declined to grant bail, noting the serious nature of the charges and risks of witness tampering or the accused absconding during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts