VIPULBHAI ISHWARBHAI ALIAS ISABHAI KANANI vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 446/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th April 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBN010011242026
Filing Number
446/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
446/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198048260046
Police Station
SONGADH POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIPULBHAI ISHWARBHAI ALIAS ISABHAI KANANI
Adv. V B GOHEL
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP
Hearing History
Judge: 2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 06-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 03-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 25-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA/446/2026 Court Decision: The court REJECTED the petitioner Vipulbhai Ishwarbhai Kanani's bail application under BNS Section 483. The petitioner was charged under IPC Section 64(2)(m) and 351(2) for allegedly befriending the victim, sharing intimate photographs, allowing photo circulation, and repeatedly committing forced physical contact. The court found prima facie evidence of serious charges, ongoing investigation, risk of witness intimidation, flight risk, and societal harm from granting bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMA/446/2026 Court Decision: The court REJECTED the petitioner Vipulbhai Ishwarbhai Kanani's bail application under BNS Section 483. The petitioner was charged under IPC Section 64(2)(m) and 351(2) for allegedly befriending the victim, sharing intimate photographs, allowing photo circulation, and repeatedly committing forced physical contact. The court found prima facie evidence of serious charges, ongoing investigation, risk of witness intimidation, flight risk, and societal harm from granting bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts