VIPULBHAI ISHWARBHAI ALIAS ISABHAI KANANI vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 446/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th April 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBN010011242026
Filing Number
446/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
446/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
2-3rd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198048260046
Police Station
SONGADH POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIPULBHAI ISHWARBHAI ALIAS ISABHAI KANANI
Adv. V B GOHEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: CRMA/446/2026 Court Decision: The court REJECTED the petitioner Vipulbhai Ishwarbhai Kanani's bail application under BNS Section 483. The petitioner was charged under IPC Section 64(2)(m) and 351(2) for allegedly befriending the victim, sharing intimate photographs, allowing photo circulation, and repeatedly committing forced physical contact. The court found prima facie evidence of serious charges, ongoing investigation, risk of witness intimidation, flight risk, and societal harm from granting bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Disposed
3rd Addl District Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Order
3rd Addl District Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
03-Apr-2026
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 446/2026
Case Summary: CRMA/446/2026 Court Decision: The court REJECTED the petitioner Vipulbhai Ishwarbhai Kanani's bail application under BNS Section 483. The petitioner was charged under IPC Section 64(2)(m) and 351(2) for allegedly befriending the victim, sharing intimate photographs, allowing photo circulation, and repeatedly committing forced physical contact. The court found prima facie evidence of serious charges, ongoing investigation, risk of witness intimidation, flight risk, and societal harm from granting bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts