ANAVARBHAI ALIAS AB IBRAHIMBHAI SIDI vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 440/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBN010010302026
Filing Number
440/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
440/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198001240094
Police Station
NILAMBAUG POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANAVARBHAI ALIAS AB IBRAHIMBHAI SIDI
Adv. S Y HAMIRANI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP
Hearing History
Judge: 3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 17-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
| 16-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Misc. Application No. 440/2026 The court rejected the applicant Anavarbhai's request for 15 days temporary bail to undergo surgery for a tibiafibular ligament injury. While acknowledging the medical need for the operation, the judge found that the grounds for temporary bail were insufficient given the serious NDPS Act charges (sections 8(C), 22(C), 29) and police concerns that the applicant might flee if released, outweighing the medical justification for bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Misc. Application No. 440/2026 The court rejected the applicant Anavarbhai's request for 15 days temporary bail to undergo surgery for a tibiafibular ligament injury. While acknowledging the medical need for the operation, the judge found that the grounds for temporary bail were insufficient given the serious NDPS Act charges (sections 8(C), 22(C), 29) and police concerns that the applicant might flee if released, outweighing the medical justification for bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts