ANAVARBHAI ALIAS AB IBRAHIMBHAI SIDI vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 438/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBN010010282026
Filing Number
438/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
438/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198020240686
Police Station
GHOGHA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANAVARBHAI ALIAS AB IBRAHIMBHAI SIDI
Adv. S Y HAMIRANI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP
Hearing History
Judge: 3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 17-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
| 16-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 438/2026 The court rejected Anavarbhai's application for 15 days temporary bail under Section 483 BNSS 2023. Although the applicant required surgery for a tibiafibular ligament injury, the court found insufficient grounds for release due to serious apprehension of flight risk, the gravity of NDPS Act charges (sections 8(C), 22(C), 29), and police concerns about trial evasion. The court determined the surgery could be performed at local facilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 438/2026 The court rejected Anavarbhai's application for 15 days temporary bail under Section 483 BNSS 2023. Although the applicant required surgery for a tibiafibular ligament injury, the court found insufficient grounds for release due to serious apprehension of flight risk, the gravity of NDPS Act charges (sections 8(C), 22(C), 29), and police concerns about trial evasion. The court determined the surgery could be performed at local facilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts