THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ASHOKBHAI NARANBHAI BALIYA Advocate - U R DAVE — 9/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 109,115(2),352,54,103(1). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th March 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJBN010010022025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

13-02-2025

Filing Number

9/2025

Filing Date

11-02-2025

Registration No

9/2025

Registration Date

11-02-2025

Court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198048240422

Police Station

SONGADH POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 109,115(2),352,54,103(1)
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. M R JOSHI, J D KEDA

Respondent(s)

ASHOKBHAI NARANBHAI BALIYA Advocate - U R DAVE

GOKULBHAI NARANBHAI BALIYA

Adv. U R DAVE

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

13-03-2026

Disposed

27-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

13-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

31-01-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

23-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 9/2025 Court Decision: Both accused, Ashokbhai Naranbhai Baliya and Gokulbhai Naranbhai Baliya, were acquitted of charges under BNS sections 103(1), 109, 115(2), 352, 54, and GPA section 135. The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused the victim's death through intentional injuries. Key Reasoning: Despite medical evidence confirming serious head injuries and other trauma, the court found insufficient evidence directly linking the accused to the assault. Critical gaps included the complainant's own testimony lacking specificity about the attack, absence of corroborating eyewitness accounts naming the accused, and investigative inconsistencies regarding initial medical records and injury documentation at the first health center visited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 9/2025 Court Decision: Both accused, Ashokbhai Naranbhai Baliya and Gokulbhai Naranbhai Baliya, were acquitted of charges under BNS sections 103(1), 109, 115(2), 352, 54, and GPA section 135. The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused the victim's death through intentional injuries. Key Reasoning: Despite medical evidence confirming serious head injuries and other trauma, the court found insufficient evidence directly linking the accused to the assault. Critical gaps included the complainant's own testimony lacking specificity about the attack, absence of corroborating eyewitness accounts naming the accused, and investigative inconsistencies regarding initial medical records and injury documentation at the first health center visited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case