THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ASHOKBHAI NARANBHAI BALIYA Advocate - U R DAVE — 9/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 109,115(2),352,54,103(1). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJBN010010022025
e-Filing Number
13-02-2025
Filing Number
9/2025
Filing Date
11-02-2025
Registration No
9/2025
Registration Date
11-02-2025
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198048240422
Police Station
SONGADH POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. M R JOSHI, J D KEDA
Respondent(s)
ASHOKBHAI NARANBHAI BALIYA Advocate - U R DAVE
GOKULBHAI NARANBHAI BALIYA
Adv. U R DAVE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 31-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 23-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 9/2025 Court Decision: Both accused, Ashokbhai Naranbhai Baliya and Gokulbhai Naranbhai Baliya, were acquitted of charges under BNS sections 103(1), 109, 115(2), 352, 54, and GPA section 135. The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused the victim's death through intentional injuries. Key Reasoning: Despite medical evidence confirming serious head injuries and other trauma, the court found insufficient evidence directly linking the accused to the assault. Critical gaps included the complainant's own testimony lacking specificity about the attack, absence of corroborating eyewitness accounts naming the accused, and investigative inconsistencies regarding initial medical records and injury documentation at the first health center visited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 9/2025 Court Decision: Both accused, Ashokbhai Naranbhai Baliya and Gokulbhai Naranbhai Baliya, were acquitted of charges under BNS sections 103(1), 109, 115(2), 352, 54, and GPA section 135. The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused the victim's death through intentional injuries. Key Reasoning: Despite medical evidence confirming serious head injuries and other trauma, the court found insufficient evidence directly linking the accused to the assault. Critical gaps included the complainant's own testimony lacking specificity about the attack, absence of corroborating eyewitness accounts naming the accused, and investigative inconsistencies regarding initial medical records and injury documentation at the first health center visited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts