URVASHIBEN DURVIJAYSINH LODHI LEGAL HEIR OF DECD DURVIJAYSINH ALIAS PAPPUBHAI BHARATSINH LODHI vs SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMAPNY — 126/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 105. Disposed: Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJBN010009392026

Filing Number

126/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

126/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

3-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 105

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.URVASHIBEN DURVIJAYSINH LODHI LEGAL HEIR OF DECD DURVIJAYSINH ALIAS PAPPUBHAI BHARATSINH LODHI

    Adv. R V NAVADIYA

  2. 2.MINOR PALAKBEN DURVIJAYSINH LODHI

    Adv. R V NAVADIYA

  3. 3.LONGESHREEBEN BHARATSINH LODHI

    Adv. R V NAVADIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMAPNY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court partly allowed the application for disbursement of Rs. 17,17,818/- in compensation awarded in the underlying motor vehicle accident claim (MACP No. 176/2018). The court ordered release of the amount to petitioners No. 3 and 7 in their bank account, while rejecting the claim of petitioner No. 1 (Urvashiben) and directing that shares of other applicants be invested as fixed deposits with the court's Nazir pending fulfillment of original award terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Order

    4th Addl District Judge

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 126/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court partly allowed the application for disbursement of Rs. 17,17,818/- in compensation awarded in the underlying motor vehicle accident claim (MACP No. 176/2018). The court ordered release of the amount to petitioners No. 3 and 7 in their bank account, while rejecting the claim of petitioner No. 1 (Urvashiben) and directing that shares of other applicants be invested as fixed deposits with the court's Nazir pending fulfillment of original award terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case