DIPAKBHAI VELJIBHAI BARAIYA vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 426/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBN010009162026
Filing Number
426/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
426/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
01
Police Station
ACB POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DIPAKBHAI VELJIBHAI BARAIYA
Adv. P K GOHEL
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP
Hearing History
Judge: 2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cri.Mis.Appli.No.426/2026 Dipakbhai Veljibhai Baraiya v. State of Gujarat The court ordered regular bail for the petitioner, Dipakbhai Veljibhai Baraiya, who was arrested under serious charges including corruption-related offenses under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 (as amended 2018), specifically Sections 7(a) and 13(2). The court found the petitioner's detention unjustified given the prima facie weakness of the prosecution's case regarding the serious allegations, combined with the petitioner's established ties to the community, family obligations, and lack of prior criminal record. The court determined that denying bail would be disproportionate and contrary to principles of justice, authorizing his release on regular bail with appropriate conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cri.Mis.Appli.No.426/2026 Dipakbhai Veljibhai Baraiya v. State of Gujarat The court ordered regular bail for the petitioner, Dipakbhai Veljibhai Baraiya, who was arrested under serious charges including corruption-related offenses under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 (as amended 2018), specifically Sections 7(a) and 13(2). The court found the petitioner's detention unjustified given the prima facie weakness of the prosecution's case regarding the serious allegations, combined with the petitioner's established ties to the community, family obligations, and lack of prior criminal record. The court determined that denying bail would be disproportionate and contrary to principles of justice, authorizing his release on regular bail with appropriate conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts