VISHAL DINESHBHAI GOHIL vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR — 412/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJBN010007982026

Filing Number

412/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

412/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

2-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198048250379

Police Station

SONGADH POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 72(1),64(2)(m),65(1),352,64(2)(f),64(2)(i)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 6,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHAL DINESHBHAI GOHIL

    Adv. P P JADEJA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court rejected the petitioner Vishal Dineshbhai Gohil's plea seeking custody of a seized motorcycle (Motorola AXE 50) from Songarh Police Station. The court found that the motorcycle was crucial evidence in serious criminal charges and that returning it to the petitioner would risk tampering with evidence, noting the phone's data recovery capability was essential for the investigation. The court dismissed the petition, holding that retaining the motorcycle as evidence was legally justified and necessary for proper criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Order

    3rd Addl District Judge

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Order

    3rd Addl District Judge

  6. 03-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  7. 27-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  9. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  10. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  11. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  12. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  13. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  14. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 412/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the petitioner Vishal Dineshbhai Gohil's plea seeking custody of a seized motorcycle (Motorola AXE 50) from Songarh Police Station. The court found that the motorcycle was crucial evidence in serious criminal charges and that returning it to the petitioner would risk tampering with evidence, noting the phone's data recovery capability was essential for the investigation. The court dismissed the petition, holding that retaining the motorcycle as evidence was legally justified and necessary for proper criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case