DEVAYATBHAI ARJANBHAI CHAUHAN vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 391/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 30th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBN010007582026
Filing Number
391/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
391/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198048260034
Police Station
SONGADH POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DEVAYATBHAI ARJANBHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. A B BHATT
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP
Hearing History
Judge: 2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 24-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 20-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 18-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA/391/2026 The court rejected the bail application of Devayatbhai Arjanbhai Chauhan, who was accused of illegal occupation of Songarh Gurukul institutional land under the Gujarat Land Requisition Act (sections 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), and 4(3)). The court found a prima facie case existed against the accused, noting serious charges carrying sentences of 10-14 years imprisonment, and determined that granting bail would undermine law enforcement, encourage similar illegal encroachments on government property, and pose risks to witnesses and evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMA/391/2026 The court rejected the bail application of Devayatbhai Arjanbhai Chauhan, who was accused of illegal occupation of Songarh Gurukul institutional land under the Gujarat Land Requisition Act (sections 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), and 4(3)). The court found a prima facie case existed against the accused, noting serious charges carrying sentences of 10-14 years imprisonment, and determined that granting bail would undermine law enforcement, encourage similar illegal encroachments on government property, and pose risks to witnesses and evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts