MUKESHBHAI ALIAS BUDHO RUPABHAI VAGHELA vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 380/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBN010007472026
Filing Number
380/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
380/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
2-3rd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198042251029
Police Station
PALITANA TOWN POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUKESHBHAI ALIAS BUDHO RUPABHAI VAGHELA
Adv. S B KADARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP
-
2.MADHUBEN WIFE OF RAMESHBHAI DEVJIBHAI PARMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 380/2026 The court granted bail to the petitioner Mukeshbhai (alias Budho) Rupabhai Vaghela, who was accused of serious offenses under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 64(2), and sections 3(a), 4, 5(l), 6, 8, 18 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found that while the charges were grave, the petitioner's long pre-trial detention, lack of prior criminal record, family responsibilities as a laborer supporting dependents, and weak prima facie case evidence warranted his release on regular bail with appropriate conditions to ensure trial attendance and public safety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Addl District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Order
3rd Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 380/2026
Summary of Case 380/2026 The court granted bail to the petitioner Mukeshbhai (alias Budho) Rupabhai Vaghela, who was accused of serious offenses under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 64(2), and sections 3(a), 4, 5(l), 6, 8, 18 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found that while the charges were grave, the petitioner's long pre-trial detention, lack of prior criminal record, family responsibilities as a laborer supporting dependents, and weak prima facie case evidence warranted his release on regular bail with appropriate conditions to ensure trial attendance and public safety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts