MUKESHBHAI ALIAS BUDHO RUPABHAI VAGHELA vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 380/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBN010007472026
Filing Number
380/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
380/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198042251029
Police Station
PALITANA TOWN POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MUKESHBHAI ALIAS BUDHO RUPABHAI VAGHELA
Adv. S B KADARI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP
MADHUBEN WIFE OF RAMESHBHAI DEVJIBHAI PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 03-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 380/2026 The court granted bail to the petitioner Mukeshbhai (alias Budho) Rupabhai Vaghela, who was accused of serious offenses under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 64(2), and sections 3(a), 4, 5(l), 6, 8, 18 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found that while the charges were grave, the petitioner's long pre-trial detention, lack of prior criminal record, family responsibilities as a laborer supporting dependents, and weak prima facie case evidence warranted his release on regular bail with appropriate conditions to ensure trial attendance and public safety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 380/2026 The court granted bail to the petitioner Mukeshbhai (alias Budho) Rupabhai Vaghela, who was accused of serious offenses under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 64(2), and sections 3(a), 4, 5(l), 6, 8, 18 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found that while the charges were grave, the petitioner's long pre-trial detention, lack of prior criminal record, family responsibilities as a laborer supporting dependents, and weak prima facie case evidence warranted his release on regular bail with appropriate conditions to ensure trial attendance and public safety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts