DULABHAI BABUBHAI PARMAR GUARDIAN OF JUVENILE ACCUSED vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 368/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBN010007132026
Filing Number
368/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
368/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
25
Police Station
PALITANA RURAL POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DULABHAI BABUBHAI PARMAR GUARDIAN OF JUVENILE ACCUSED
Adv. S Y HAMIRANI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP
MINABEN DAUGHTER OF LAGHUBHAI NARANBHAI PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 10-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 26-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the petition seeking condonation of a 294-day delay in filing an appeal against a juvenile court order. The court held that the petitioner (guardian of the juvenile accused) failed to provide adequate justification for the delay and lacked proper legal representation during the trial, thus the delay could not be condoned under the prescribed legal framework. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the petition seeking condonation of a 294-day delay in filing an appeal against a juvenile court order. The court held that the petitioner (guardian of the juvenile accused) failed to provide adequate justification for the delay and lacked proper legal representation during the trial, thus the delay could not be condoned under the prescribed legal framework. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts