HITESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI DAVE vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 365/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJBN010007102026

Case disposed

Filing Number

365/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

365/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198042200041

Police Station

PALITANA TOWN POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 363,366,376(2)(j)(n)
PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012 Section 10,17,18

Petitioner(s)

HITESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI DAVE

Adv. B M JOSHI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP

Hearing History

Judge: 3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

17-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

ORDER

27-02-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

25-02-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: The court granted bail to Hiteshbhai Rameshbhai Dave in a POCSO case involving charges under IPC Sections 363, 376(2)(J)(N), 376(3) and POCSO Act Sections 6, 10, 18. The applicant was arrested on a warrant after absconding due to illness and misunderstanding about trial dates. The court found the absence non-deliberate and noted the High Court had previously released him on bail on merits. Bail was approved with conditions including Rs.25,000 personal bond, Rs.25,000 cash deposit, Rs.500 penalty, and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The court granted bail to Hiteshbhai Rameshbhai Dave in a POCSO case involving charges under IPC Sections 363, 376(2)(J)(N), 376(3) and POCSO Act Sections 6, 10, 18. The applicant was arrested on a warrant after absconding due to illness and misunderstanding about trial dates. The court found the absence non-deliberate and noted the High Court had previously released him on bail on merits. Bail was approved with conditions including Rs.25,000 personal bond, Rs.25,000 cash deposit, Rs.500 penalty, and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case