KISHORBHAI BACHUBHAI PARMAR vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 337/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBN010006612026
Filing Number
337/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
337/2026
Registration Date
19-02-2026
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198042250647
Police Station
PALITANA TOWN POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KISHORBHAI BACHUBHAI PARMAR
Adv. B H DODIYA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP
VICTIM
Hearing History
Judge: 2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 17-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 337/2026 Kishorbhai Bachubhai Parmar v. State of Gujarat The Gujarat High Court granted bail to petitioner Kishorbhai Bachubhai Parmar, accused of serious offenses under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 64(2) and related provisions. The court held that while grave charges exist, the accused qualifies for bail considering he is a young man from a poor background with family responsibilities, no criminal history, and has already undergone significant investigation. The court emphasized that granting bail would not prejudice the victim's interests or society, and noted the prolonged trial could be delayed further if custody continued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 337/2026 Kishorbhai Bachubhai Parmar v. State of Gujarat The Gujarat High Court granted bail to petitioner Kishorbhai Bachubhai Parmar, accused of serious offenses under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 64(2) and related provisions. The court held that while grave charges exist, the accused qualifies for bail considering he is a young man from a poor background with family responsibilities, no criminal history, and has already undergone significant investigation. The court emphasized that granting bail would not prejudice the victim's interests or society, and noted the prolonged trial could be delayed further if custody continued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts