MAHESHBHAI PITHABHAI KHIMSURIYA vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 335/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJBN010006592026

Case disposed

Filing Number

335/2026

Filing Date

19-02-2026

Registration No

335/2026

Registration Date

19-02-2026

Court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198015260026

Police Station

BOR TALAV POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 64(2)(k),64(2)(m)

Petitioner(s)

MAHESHBHAI PITHABHAI KHIMSURIYA

Adv. K A VYAS

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP

BHANIBEN RAJUBHAI SONDARVA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

23-03-2026

Disposed

20-03-2026

ORDER

17-03-2026

HEARING

13-03-2026

HEARING

11-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: CRMA S/335/2026 The court granted bail to petitioner Maheshbhai Pithabhai Khimsuriya in a Criminal Miscellaneous Application, directing his release on regular bail from custody. The court, considering the serious nature of the IPC Section 64(2)(c)(a) charges (a grave offense), balanced the gravity of the crime against the petitioner's personal circumstances, family responsibilities, and lack of prior criminal record. The court imposed appropriate bail conditions to ensure the petitioner's appearance in court and protect public interest while recognizing that custodial detention was not justified under the circumstances of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMA S/335/2026 The court granted bail to petitioner Maheshbhai Pithabhai Khimsuriya in a Criminal Miscellaneous Application, directing his release on regular bail from custody. The court, considering the serious nature of the IPC Section 64(2)(c)(a) charges (a grave offense), balanced the gravity of the crime against the petitioner's personal circumstances, family responsibilities, and lack of prior criminal record. The court imposed appropriate bail conditions to ensure the petitioner's appearance in court and protect public interest while recognizing that custodial detention was not justified under the circumstances of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case