MAHESHBHAI PITHABHAI KHIMSURIYA vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 335/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBN010006592026
Filing Number
335/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
335/2026
Registration Date
19-02-2026
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198015260026
Police Station
BOR TALAV POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHESHBHAI PITHABHAI KHIMSURIYA
Adv. K A VYAS
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP
BHANIBEN RAJUBHAI SONDARVA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 17-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA S/335/2026 The court granted bail to petitioner Maheshbhai Pithabhai Khimsuriya in a Criminal Miscellaneous Application, directing his release on regular bail from custody. The court, considering the serious nature of the IPC Section 64(2)(c)(a) charges (a grave offense), balanced the gravity of the crime against the petitioner's personal circumstances, family responsibilities, and lack of prior criminal record. The court imposed appropriate bail conditions to ensure the petitioner's appearance in court and protect public interest while recognizing that custodial detention was not justified under the circumstances of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMA S/335/2026 The court granted bail to petitioner Maheshbhai Pithabhai Khimsuriya in a Criminal Miscellaneous Application, directing his release on regular bail from custody. The court, considering the serious nature of the IPC Section 64(2)(c)(a) charges (a grave offense), balanced the gravity of the crime against the petitioner's personal circumstances, family responsibilities, and lack of prior criminal record. The court imposed appropriate bail conditions to ensure the petitioner's appearance in court and protect public interest while recognizing that custodial detention was not justified under the circumstances of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts