ROHIT ALIAS CHANI HARESHBHAI BARAIYA vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 323/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 02nd May 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBN010006322026
Filing Number
323/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
323/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198006220876
Police Station
GHOGHA ROAD POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ROHIT ALIAS CHANI HARESHBHAI BARAIYA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP
Hearing History
Judge: 2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 23-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 22-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-04-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case CRMA/323/2026: The court rejected petitioner Rohit Baraiya's bail application seeking release on land security for 21 days. The petitioner, facing serious criminal charges under IPC Sections 302, 323, 324, and 120(B) and CrPC Section 135 (registered at Ghogaroad Police Station), argued his family's financial hardship and need to support elderly parents and a younger brother's education. However, the court found no compelling grounds warranting bail, as the investigation records and police reports did not establish circumstances necessitating the petitioner's release during the specified period. The court upheld the custody order and directed the jail authorities to be notified accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case CRMA/323/2026: The court rejected petitioner Rohit Baraiya's bail application seeking release on land security for 21 days. The petitioner, facing serious criminal charges under IPC Sections 302, 323, 324, and 120(B) and CrPC Section 135 (registered at Ghogaroad Police Station), argued his family's financial hardship and need to support elderly parents and a younger brother's education. However, the court found no compelling grounds warranting bail, as the investigation records and police reports did not establish circumstances necessitating the petitioner's release during the specified period. The court upheld the custody order and directed the jail authorities to be notified accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts