SUNIL GHISALAL MANDLOI vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 316/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBN010006112026
Filing Number
316/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
316/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
2-3rd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198066260024
Police Station
VELAVADAR POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNIL GHISALAL MANDLOI
Adv. T H BORICHA
-
2.LOKESH JAGDISHBHAI DAVAR
Adv. T H BORICHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case 316/2026 Summary The court rejected the bail application of petitioners Sunil Ghisalal Mandloi and Lokesh Jagdishbhai Davar, who were arrested under Prohibition Act sections 6A(1)(E), 116(B), 98(2), 81, and 83 for allegedly transporting liquor worth ₹10,86,144. The court found a prima facie case existed, as the accused were intercepted with contraband English liquor and beer in their vehicle, and emphasized that releasing them on bail could enable them to tamper with evidence, abscond, or aid co-accused still at large. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Order
3rd Addl District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 316/2026
Case 316/2026 Summary The court rejected the bail application of petitioners Sunil Ghisalal Mandloi and Lokesh Jagdishbhai Davar, who were arrested under Prohibition Act sections 6A(1)(E), 116(B), 98(2), 81, and 83 for allegedly transporting liquor worth ₹10,86,144. The court found a prima facie case existed, as the accused were intercepted with contraband English liquor and beer in their vehicle, and emphasized that releasing them on bail could enable them to tamper with evidence, abscond, or aid co-accused still at large. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts