SUNIL GHISALAL MANDLOI vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 316/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJBN010006112026

Case disposed

Filing Number

316/2026

Filing Date

17-02-2026

Registration No

316/2026

Registration Date

17-02-2026

Court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198066260024

Police Station

VELAVADAR POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(AE),116(B),81,83,98(2)

Petitioner(s)

SUNIL GHISALAL MANDLOI

Adv. T H BORICHA

LOKESH JAGDISHBHAI DAVAR

Adv. T H BORICHA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP

Hearing History

Judge: 2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

13-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

ORDER

07-03-2026

HEARING

25-02-2026

HEARING

19-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case 316/2026 Summary The court rejected the bail application of petitioners Sunil Ghisalal Mandloi and Lokesh Jagdishbhai Davar, who were arrested under Prohibition Act sections 6A(1)(E), 116(B), 98(2), 81, and 83 for allegedly transporting liquor worth ₹10,86,144. The court found a prima facie case existed, as the accused were intercepted with contraband English liquor and beer in their vehicle, and emphasized that releasing them on bail could enable them to tamper with evidence, abscond, or aid co-accused still at large. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 316/2026 Summary The court rejected the bail application of petitioners Sunil Ghisalal Mandloi and Lokesh Jagdishbhai Davar, who were arrested under Prohibition Act sections 6A(1)(E), 116(B), 98(2), 81, and 83 for allegedly transporting liquor worth ₹10,86,144. The court found a prima facie case existed, as the accused were intercepted with contraband English liquor and beer in their vehicle, and emphasized that releasing them on bail could enable them to tamper with evidence, abscond, or aid co-accused still at large. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case