PIYUSHBHAI SHAILESHBHAI PATEL PROPRIETOR OF AMBIKA ENTERPRISE vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH DGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 52/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 413. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJBN010005892026

Filing Number

52/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

52/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMPROMISED

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 413
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PIYUSHBHAI SHAILESHBHAI PATEL PROPRIETOR OF AMBIKA ENTERPRISE

    Adv. V B RANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH DGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP

  2. 2.KANTIBHAI POPATBHAI RATHOD PROPRIETOR OF JAY BHAVANI INDUSTRIES

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court disposed of the petition by directing the petitioner and their counsel to approach the appropriate appellate forum if they wish to pursue the matter further. The court found no grounds to entertain the petition and instructed that any legal redressal should be sought through the proper appellate channels rather than in this proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 52/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the petition by directing the petitioner and their counsel to approach the appropriate appellate forum if they wish to pursue the matter further. The court found no grounds to entertain the petition and instructed that any legal redressal should be sought through the proper appellate channels rather than in this proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case