HASMUKHBHAI VALJIBHAI VAGHELA vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 293/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBN010005482026
Filing Number
293/2026
Filing Date
12-02-2026
Registration No
293/2026
Registration Date
12-02-2026
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198048250382
Police Station
SONGADH POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HASMUKHBHAI VALJIBHAI VAGHELA
Adv. P P JADEJA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP
Hearing History
Judge: 2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 25-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA/293/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected Hasmukhbhai Valjibhai Vaghela's bail application under BNS Section 483. The petitioner was charged with serious offenses including robbery and grievous hurt under IPC Sections 392, 397, and 506, along with the Gujarat Protection Act Section 137. Key Reasoning: The court found that the petitioner has a criminal history with 17 previous cases registered against him, making him a habitual offender. Given the severe nature of the charges, evidence of robbery (₹42,000 worth of jewelry recovered), prior convictions, and risk of absconding or tampering with witnesses, the court determined bail was inappropriate at this stage of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMA/293/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected Hasmukhbhai Valjibhai Vaghela's bail application under BNS Section 483. The petitioner was charged with serious offenses including robbery and grievous hurt under IPC Sections 392, 397, and 506, along with the Gujarat Protection Act Section 137. Key Reasoning: The court found that the petitioner has a criminal history with 17 previous cases registered against him, making him a habitual offender. Given the severe nature of the charges, evidence of robbery (₹42,000 worth of jewelry recovered), prior convictions, and risk of absconding or tampering with witnesses, the court determined bail was inappropriate at this stage of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts