VIJAYBHAI DHIRUBHAI RATHOD vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP — 243/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBN010004642026
Filing Number
243/2026
Filing Date
06-02-2026
Registration No
243/2026
Registration Date
06-02-2026
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198042251093
Police Station
PALITANA TOWN POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIJAYBHAI DHIRUBHAI RATHOD
Adv. J A MAKWANA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - AGP
Hearing History
Judge: 2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 25-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 23-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 243/2026 Petitioner: Vijaybhai Dhirubhai Rathod Respondent: State of Gujarat (through AGP Bhavnagar) Court Decision The court granted bail to petitioner Vijaybhai Dhirubhai Rathod on regular bail bond. The petitioner was accused of serious criminal charges under IPC Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) and relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita provisions, including charges related to unlawful restraint and moral turpitude. The court found that while grave charges existed, the petitioner's status as a working-class family earner with dependents, absence of prior criminal history, and lengthy pre-trial incarceration warranted release on bail with appropriate conditions and sureties to ensure court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 243/2026 Petitioner: Vijaybhai Dhirubhai Rathod Respondent: State of Gujarat (through AGP Bhavnagar) Court Decision The court granted bail to petitioner Vijaybhai Dhirubhai Rathod on regular bail bond. The petitioner was accused of serious criminal charges under IPC Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) and relevant Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita provisions, including charges related to unlawful restraint and moral turpitude. The court found that while grave charges existed, the petitioner's status as a working-class family earner with dependents, absence of prior criminal history, and lengthy pre-trial incarceration warranted release on bail with appropriate conditions and sureties to ensure court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts