ABHABHAI RUPSIBHAI GOHIL vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V A GANDHI — 146/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBK230004682026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
146/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
146/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THARAD
Judge
1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11996005250242
Police Station
SUIGAM POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ABHABHAI RUPSIBHAI GOHIL
Adv. A B RAJPUT
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V A GANDHI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Tharad rejected the anticipatory bail application of Abhabhai Rupshibhai Gohil, accused of illicit liquor trafficking under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The court found prima facie evidence of the applicant's active involvement in "piloting" the illegal liquor operation, including phone records and tower location data linking him to the co-accused driver, establishing him as a business partner who filled the liquor in the vehicle. The court rejected the parity argument with co-accused who received bail, noting the applicant's distinct culpable role, his four-month absconding period, prior criminal history, and flight risk, necessitating custodial interrogation to determine the modus operandi of this large-scale operation involving 3,744 bottles valued at ₹10,10,448. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Tharad rejected the anticipatory bail application of Abhabhai Rupshibhai Gohil, accused of illicit liquor trafficking under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The court found prima facie evidence of the applicant's active involvement in "piloting" the illegal liquor operation, including phone records and tower location data linking him to the co-accused driver, establishing him as a business partner who filled the liquor in the vehicle. The court rejected the parity argument with co-accused who received bail, noting the applicant's distinct culpable role, his four-month absconding period, prior criminal history, and flight risk, necessitating custodial interrogation to determine the modus operandi of this large-scale operation involving 3,744 bottles valued at ₹10,10,448. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts