MUKESHBHAI DEVAJIBHAI GOHIL(RAJPUT) vs THE STATE OF GUAJRAT Advocate - V A GANDHI — 144/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJBK230004652026

Filing Number

144/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

144/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THARAD

Judge

1-Addl.district & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996006260038

Police Station

THARAD POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUKESHBHAI DEVAJIBHAI GOHIL(RAJPUT)

    Adv. A B RAJPUT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUAJRAT Advocate - V A GANDHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Mukeshbhai's bail application in an illicit liquor smuggling case involving 1,503 bottles valued at ₹3,43,634. The court found that the applicant remained absconded for 45+ days after the FIR registration, unlike co-accused who were released, and posed a flight risk and danger of re-offending. The court also directed police to recover unpaid VAT and Cow Cess taxes from the seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 144/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Mukeshbhai's bail application in an illicit liquor smuggling case involving 1,503 bottles valued at ₹3,43,634. The court found that the applicant remained absconded for 45+ days after the FIR registration, unlike co-accused who were released, and posed a flight risk and danger of re-offending. The court also directed police to recover unpaid VAT and Cow Cess taxes from the seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case