HANUMANRAM MALARAM CHAUDHARY vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V A GANDHI — 142/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJBK230004622026

Filing Number

142/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

142/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THARAD

Judge

1-Addl.district & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195050240900

Police Station

THARAD POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HANUMANRAM MALARAM CHAUDHARY

    Adv. M R HADIYAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V A GANDHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge at Tharad rejected the anticipatory bail application of Hanumanaram Malaram Chaudhary in a case involving alleged illegal liquor trafficking (8,136 bottles valued at Rs. 18,82,440). The court found that the applicant had absconded for over 16 months, custodial interrogation was necessary to establish his role, and there was substantial risk of flight and reoffending. The court also directed police to recover outstanding VAT and Cow Cess dues from the seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 142/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge at Tharad rejected the anticipatory bail application of Hanumanaram Malaram Chaudhary in a case involving alleged illegal liquor trafficking (8,136 bottles valued at Rs. 18,82,440). The court found that the applicant had absconded for over 16 months, custodial interrogation was necessary to establish his role, and there was substantial risk of flight and reoffending. The court also directed police to recover outstanding VAT and Cow Cess dues from the seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case