NARSENGBHAI (NASABHAI) BHURABHAI RAJPUT(RUPANI) vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - R D JOSHI — 141/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBK230004572026
Filing Number
141/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
141/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THARAD
Judge
1-Addl.district & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11996005260046
Police Station
SUIGAM POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NARSENGBHAI (NASABHAI) BHURABHAI RAJPUT(RUPANI)
Adv. A B RAJPUT
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - R D JOSHI
-
2.VICTIM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Tharad rejected the bail application of 26-year-old Narsengbhai, accused of persistent stalking, aggravated molestation of a 15-year-old minor victim, death threats, and offenses under BNS Sections 74, 75, 78, 351(3) and POCSO Act Sections 8 & 12. The court found prima facie strong evidence against the applicant, noted the victim's suicide attempt following severe trauma, concerns about witness tampering and evidence destruction, and the ongoing investigation, warranting continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 141/2026
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Tharad rejected the bail application of 26-year-old Narsengbhai, accused of persistent stalking, aggravated molestation of a 15-year-old minor victim, death threats, and offenses under BNS Sections 74, 75, 78, 351(3) and POCSO Act Sections 8 & 12. The court found prima facie strong evidence against the applicant, noted the victim's suicide attempt following severe trauma, concerns about witness tampering and evidence destruction, and the ongoing investigation, warranting continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts