RAJPUT GOVINDBHAI PIRABHAI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V A GANDHI — 116/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBK230003992026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
116/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
116/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THARAD
Judge
1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11996006251175
Police Station
THARAD POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJPUT GOVINDBHAI PIRABHAI
Adv. C R TRIVEDI
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V A GANDHI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 03-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 25-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Tharad, allowed the application and ordered the release of a seized Maruti Suzuki Swift vehicle (Registration No. GJ-27-AH-1146) to its registered owner, Rajput Govindbhai Pirabhai, on furnishing a bond of Rs. 2,00,000. The court reasoned that since investigation regarding the vehicle was completed, the applicant is the prima facie owner as per the registration certificate, and keeping the vehicle seized would cause deterioration and business loss, justified interim custody release under Section 497 BNSS subject to conditions that the vehicle not be sold and be produced as required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Tharad, allowed the application and ordered the release of a seized Maruti Suzuki Swift vehicle (Registration No. GJ-27-AH-1146) to its registered owner, Rajput Govindbhai Pirabhai, on furnishing a bond of Rs. 2,00,000. The court reasoned that since investigation regarding the vehicle was completed, the applicant is the prima facie owner as per the registration certificate, and keeping the vehicle seized would cause deterioration and business loss, justified interim custody release under Section 497 BNSS subject to conditions that the vehicle not be sold and be produced as required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts