RAJPUT GOVINDBHAI PIRABHAI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V A GANDHI — 116/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJBK230003992026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

116/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

116/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THARAD

Judge

1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996006251175

Police Station

THARAD POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 497

Petitioner(s)

RAJPUT GOVINDBHAI PIRABHAI

Adv. C R TRIVEDI

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V A GANDHI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

HEARING

03-03-2026

HEARING

25-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Tharad, allowed the application and ordered the release of a seized Maruti Suzuki Swift vehicle (Registration No. GJ-27-AH-1146) to its registered owner, Rajput Govindbhai Pirabhai, on furnishing a bond of Rs. 2,00,000. The court reasoned that since investigation regarding the vehicle was completed, the applicant is the prima facie owner as per the registration certificate, and keeping the vehicle seized would cause deterioration and business loss, justified interim custody release under Section 497 BNSS subject to conditions that the vehicle not be sold and be produced as required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Tharad, allowed the application and ordered the release of a seized Maruti Suzuki Swift vehicle (Registration No. GJ-27-AH-1146) to its registered owner, Rajput Govindbhai Pirabhai, on furnishing a bond of Rs. 2,00,000. The court reasoned that since investigation regarding the vehicle was completed, the applicant is the prima facie owner as per the registration certificate, and keeping the vehicle seized would cause deterioration and business loss, justified interim custody release under Section 497 BNSS subject to conditions that the vehicle not be sold and be produced as required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THARAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case