THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DASHRATHBHAI JIVABHAI PARMAR Advocate - V Y OZA — 86/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK220001092026

Filing Number

86/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

86/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUIGAM

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996005250273

Police Station

SUIGAM POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DASHRATHBHAI JIVABHAI PARMAR Advocate - V Y OZA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under Section 66(1) of the Prohibition Act for an offense committed on 29/11/2025, after the accused voluntarily confessed to the crime in court. Considering the accused's guilty plea, poor economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and plea for mercy, the court sentenced him to imprisonment until the rising of the court and imposed a fine of ₹100, with simple imprisonment of 5 days as an alternative if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 86/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Section 66(1) of the Prohibition Act for an offense committed on 29/11/2025, after the accused voluntarily confessed to the crime in court. Considering the accused's guilty plea, poor economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and plea for mercy, the court sentenced him to imprisonment until the rising of the court and imposed a fine of ₹100, with simple imprisonment of 5 days as an alternative if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case