RAJPUT(KALAMA) DHENGABHAI BHIKHABHAI vs RAJPUT(KALAMA) BHIKHABHAI GOVINDBHAI Advocate - A H BHATIYA — 3/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE DECREE on 12th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBK220000722026
Filing Number
3/2026
Filing Date
03-Feb-2026
Registration No
3/2026
Registration Date
05-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SUIGAM
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISE DECREE
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJPUT(KALAMA) DHENGABHAI BHIKHABHAI
Adv. P M CHAUHAN
-
2.RAJPUT(KALAMA) GEETABEN BHURABHAI
-
3.RAJPUT UTAMBHAI BHURABHAI
-
4.RAJPUT VIMLABEN ALIAS VIJYABEN BHURABHAI
-
5.RAJPUT CHAMANBHAI ALIAS SAMARATSINHAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJPUT(KALAMA) BHIKHABHAI GOVINDBHAI Advocate - A H BHATIYA
-
2.RAJPUT(KALAMA) VALIBEN GOVINDBHAI
-
3.RAJPUT(KALAMA) PIRABHAI GOVINDBHAI
-
4.RAJPUT(KALAMA) KARSANBHAI GOVINDBHAI
-
5.RAJPUT(KALAMA) BHEMABHAI GOVINDBHAI
-
6.RAJPUT(KALAMA) HARIBEN BHIKHABHAI
-
7.RAJPUT(KALAMA) NILABEN BHIKHABHAI
-
8.RAJPUT JIVABHAI BHOJABHAI
-
9.RAJPUT BABIBEN JIVABHAI
-
10.RAJPUT PARBATIBEN JIVABHAI AND W/O ISHVARBHAI RAJPUT
-
11.RAJPUT CHANRIKABEN JIVABHAI AND W/O DINESHBHAI
-
12.RAJPUT JINALBEN JIVABHAI AND W/O VARDHASINH
-
13.RAJPUT BHUMIBEN JIVABHAI
-
14.RAJPUT RINKUBEN ALIAS RINKALBEN JIVABHAI
-
15.RAJPUT PINABEN ALIAS KINJALBEN JIVABHAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court approved a settlement (Order 09) between the parties, declaring it as voluntary and in the interest of justice. The court dismissed the case based on the settlement agreement reached between the plaintiffs and defendants, with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 3/2026
The court approved a settlement (Order 09) between the parties, declaring it as voluntary and in the interest of justice. The court dismissed the case based on the settlement agreement reached between the plaintiffs and defendants, with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts