THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KAMLESHBHAI JORABHAI THAKOR Advocate - D B THAKOR — 41/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK220000482026

Filing Number

41/2026

Filing Date

27-Jan-2026

Registration No

41/2026

Registration Date

27-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUIGAM

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996005250303

Police Station

SUIGAM POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAMLESHBHAI JORABHAI THAKOR Advocate - D B THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under Section 66(1) of the Prohibition Act for an offense committed on 12/12/2025, finding the accused's voluntary confession and guilty plea credible after considering the circumstances, age, economic condition, and remorse. The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment until the date of the court order and imposed a fine of ₹100, with an alternative simple imprisonment of five days if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 41/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Section 66(1) of the Prohibition Act for an offense committed on 12/12/2025, finding the accused's voluntary confession and guilty plea credible after considering the circumstances, age, economic condition, and remorse. The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment until the date of the court order and imposed a fine of ₹100, with an alternative simple imprisonment of five days if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case