THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MUKESHBHAI BALVANTJI THAKOR — 229/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210002652026

Filing Number

229/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

229/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996001260034

Police Station

AGTHALA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUKESHBHAI BALVANTJI THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted respondent Mukeshbhai Balvantji Thakor under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) for liquor offenses. Considering mitigating factors—the accused's impoverished economic status, sole earning member of family, first-time offense, and genuine remorse—the court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 100 fine instead of the minimum prescribed penalty, with five days simple imprisonment as an alternative in case of non-payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 229/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Mukeshbhai Balvantji Thakor under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) for liquor offenses. Considering mitigating factors—the accused's impoverished economic status, sole earning member of family, first-time offense, and genuine remorse—the court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 100 fine instead of the minimum prescribed penalty, with five days simple imprisonment as an alternative in case of non-payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case