THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BALVANTJI SEDHAJI THAKOR — 225/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210002512026

Filing Number

225/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

225/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996001260039

Police Station

AGTHALA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BALVANTJI SEDHAJI THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted respondent Balvantji Sedhaji Thakor under Section 65(A) of the Bombay Prohibition Act for a general offense. Considering the accused's poor financial circumstances, status as the sole breadwinner of his family, remorse, voluntary confession, and that this was his first offense, the court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 100 fine instead of the statutory minimum, and awarded simple imprisonment for 2 days if the fine remained unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 225/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Balvantji Sedhaji Thakor under Section 65(A) of the Bombay Prohibition Act for a general offense. Considering the accused's poor financial circumstances, status as the sole breadwinner of his family, remorse, voluntary confession, and that this was his first offense, the court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 100 fine instead of the statutory minimum, and awarded simple imprisonment for 2 days if the fine remained unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case