THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BHAGABHAI NAGJIBHAI RABARI — 222/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85-1. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210002482026

Filing Number

222/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

222/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996001250711

Police Station

AGTHALA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85-1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHAGABHAI NAGJIBHAI RABARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 222/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Bhagabhai Nagjibhai Rabari The court convicted the respondent under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) for illegal possession and consumption of alcohol. While accepting his guilty plea, the court imposed a fine of Rs. 100 (or five days simple imprisonment in default) rather than the statutory minimum punishment, citing mitigating circumstances including the respondent's poor economic status, sole earner in family, remorse, and first-time offense, applying the principle that courts may impose lesser sentences when justified by special and adequate reasons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 222/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 222/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Bhagabhai Nagjibhai Rabari The court convicted the respondent under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) for illegal possession and consumption of alcohol. While accepting his guilty plea, the court imposed a fine of Rs. 100 (or five days simple imprisonment in default) rather than the statutory minimum punishment, citing mitigating circumstances including the respondent's poor economic status, sole earner in family, remorse, and first-time offense, applying the principle that courts may impose lesser sentences when justified by special and adequate reasons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case