THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BHAGABHAI NAGJIBHAI RABARI — 222/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85-1. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK210002482026
Filing Number
222/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
222/2026
Registration Date
20-02-2026
Court
Taluka Court, Lakhni
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11996001250711
Police Station
AGTHALA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BHAGABHAI NAGJIBHAI RABARI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 222/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Bhagabhai Nagjibhai Rabari The court convicted the respondent under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) for illegal possession and consumption of alcohol. While accepting his guilty plea, the court imposed a fine of Rs. 100 (or five days simple imprisonment in default) rather than the statutory minimum punishment, citing mitigating circumstances including the respondent's poor economic status, sole earner in family, remorse, and first-time offense, applying the principle that courts may impose lesser sentences when justified by special and adequate reasons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 222/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Bhagabhai Nagjibhai Rabari The court convicted the respondent under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) for illegal possession and consumption of alcohol. While accepting his guilty plea, the court imposed a fine of Rs. 100 (or five days simple imprisonment in default) rather than the statutory minimum punishment, citing mitigating circumstances including the respondent's poor economic status, sole earner in family, remorse, and first-time offense, applying the principle that courts may impose lesser sentences when justified by special and adequate reasons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts