THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DINESHJI BALAVANTJI THAKOR — 221/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85-1. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210002472026

Filing Number

221/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

221/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996001260028

Police Station

AGTHALA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85-1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DINESHJI BALAVANTJI THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 221/2026: State of Gujarat v. Dineshji Balavantji Thakor The court convicted the accused Dineshji Balavantji Thakor under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) for illegal possession and consumption of alcohol. Considering mitigating factors including the accused's impoverished background, status as sole earning family member, and first-time offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine instead of the statutory minimum, in exercise of its discretionary power to award lesser punishment when justified by special circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 221/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 221/2026: State of Gujarat v. Dineshji Balavantji Thakor The court convicted the accused Dineshji Balavantji Thakor under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) for illegal possession and consumption of alcohol. Considering mitigating factors including the accused's impoverished background, status as sole earning family member, and first-time offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine instead of the statutory minimum, in exercise of its discretionary power to award lesser punishment when justified by special circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case