THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs POPATJI GAGAJIJI THAKOR — 201/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210002262026

Filing Number

201/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

201/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996001260022

Police Station

AGTHALA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.POPATJI GAGAJIJI THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: The State of Gujarat v. Popatji Gagajiji Thakor (201/2026) The court convicted the accused, Popatji Gagajiji Thakor, under IPC Section 65(a) for committing a general offense. Considering the accused's poor socioeconomic background, status as the sole earning family member, remorse, and this being his first offense, the court exercised leniency and sentenced him to Rs. 100 fine instead of the maximum prescribed punishment, allowing him the opportunity for rehabilitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 201/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The State of Gujarat v. Popatji Gagajiji Thakor (201/2026) The court convicted the accused, Popatji Gagajiji Thakor, under IPC Section 65(a) for committing a general offense. Considering the accused's poor socioeconomic background, status as the sole earning family member, remorse, and this being his first offense, the court exercised leniency and sentenced him to Rs. 100 fine instead of the maximum prescribed punishment, allowing him the opportunity for rehabilitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case