THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRAKASHJI BHUPTAJI THAKOR — 199/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210002242026

Filing Number

199/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

199/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996001250681

Police Station

AGTHALA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAKASHJI BHUPTAJI THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 199/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Prakashji Bhuptaji Thakor The court convicted Prakashji Bhuptaji Thakor under IPC Section 65(A) for a general offense. Considering the accused's poor economic circumstances, first-time offender status, sole earning family member status, and genuine remorse demonstrated through voluntary confession, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine instead of the statutory maximum, exercising its discretion to award minimum punishment justified by special circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 199/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 199/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Prakashji Bhuptaji Thakor The court convicted Prakashji Bhuptaji Thakor under IPC Section 65(A) for a general offense. Considering the accused's poor economic circumstances, first-time offender status, sole earning family member status, and genuine remorse demonstrated through voluntary confession, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine instead of the statutory maximum, exercising its discretion to award minimum punishment justified by special circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case