THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PINTUBHAI JOGAJI THAKOR — 196/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,116(2). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210002212026

Filing Number

196/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

196/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996001250706

Police Station

AGTHALA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,116(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PINTUBHAI JOGAJI THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted respondent Pintubhai Jogaji Thakor under IPC Section 65(2) for a general offense and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 (one hundred rupees) with two days simple imprisonment in default. The court considered mitigating circumstances including the accused's poor financial status, family dependence, first-time offender status, and remorse, which justified imposing the minimum sentence rather than the prescribed maximum penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 196/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Pintubhai Jogaji Thakor under IPC Section 65(2) for a general offense and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 (one hundred rupees) with two days simple imprisonment in default. The court considered mitigating circumstances including the accused's poor financial status, family dependence, first-time offender status, and remorse, which justified imposing the minimum sentence rather than the prescribed maximum penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case