THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRATAPBHAI ALIAS CHAPABHAI BHARABHAI THAKOR — 195/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,116-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210002202026

Case disposed

Filing Number

195/2026

Filing Date

16-02-2026

Registration No

195/2026

Registration Date

16-02-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996006251004

Police Station

THARAD POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA,116-B

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

PRATAPBHAI ALIAS CHAPABHAI BHARABHAI THAKOR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary: State of Gujarat v. Pratapbhai Alias Chapabhai Bharabhai Thakor (CC 195/2026) The court convicted the respondent under IPC Section 65(2) for a general offense and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100, with simple imprisonment for two days as alternative punishment. The court considered mitigating factors including the respondent's poor economic status, being the sole earning family member, inability to pay fine due to poverty, remorse for the crime, and this being his first offense, resulting in the lenient sentence imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: State of Gujarat v. Pratapbhai Alias Chapabhai Bharabhai Thakor (CC 195/2026) The court convicted the respondent under IPC Section 65(2) for a general offense and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100, with simple imprisonment for two days as alternative punishment. The court considered mitigating factors including the respondent's poor economic status, being the sole earning family member, inability to pay fine due to poverty, remorse for the crime, and this being his first offense, resulting in the lenient sentence imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Taluka Court, Lakhni All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case