THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ASHOKBHAI PRATAPBHAI TAHKOR — 194/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210002192026

Filing Number

194/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

194/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996006251387

Police Station

THARAD POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHOKBHAI PRATAPBHAI TAHKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted accused Ashokbhai Pratapbhai Tahkor under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) for unlawful possession and consumption of alcohol. However, the court exercised discretionary leniency under section 264 IPC and sentenced him to only Rs. 100 fine (instead of the minimum prescribed punishment), considering his poor economic status as the sole earning family member and his lack of previous criminal history. The judgment was pronounced on 14/03/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 194/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted accused Ashokbhai Pratapbhai Tahkor under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) for unlawful possession and consumption of alcohol. However, the court exercised discretionary leniency under section 264 IPC and sentenced him to only Rs. 100 fine (instead of the minimum prescribed punishment), considering his poor economic status as the sole earning family member and his lack of previous criminal history. The judgment was pronounced on 14/03/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case