THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BALAJI ALIAS BALAVANTSINH GAMJI SODHA — 193/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210002182026

Filing Number

193/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

193/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996006251188

Police Station

THARAD POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BALAJI ALIAS BALAVANTSINH GAMJI SODHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted respondent Balaji Alias Balavantsinh Gamji Sodha under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1), sentencing him to imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 100. The court, considering the respondent's poor economic status, first-time offense, and role as sole earner, imposed lenient punishment below the statutory minimum, exercising judicial discretion based on sufficient and reasonable grounds for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 193/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Balaji Alias Balavantsinh Gamji Sodha under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1), sentencing him to imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 100. The court, considering the respondent's poor economic status, first-time offense, and role as sole earner, imposed lenient punishment below the statutory minimum, exercising judicial discretion based on sufficient and reasonable grounds for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case