THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs LEBABHAI PRAHLADBHAI MAJIRANA — 187/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210002102026

Filing Number

187/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

187/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996001260016

Police Station

AGTHALA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LEBABHAI PRAHLADBHAI MAJIRANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted Lebabhai Prahladbhai Majirana under IPC Section 65(e) for a general offense and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100, with two days' simple imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the accused's poor economic condition, his status as the sole earning family member, his remorse, and the fact that this was his first offense as mitigating circumstances warranting a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 187/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Lebabhai Prahladbhai Majirana under IPC Section 65(e) for a general offense and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100, with two days' simple imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the accused's poor economic condition, his status as the sole earning family member, his remorse, and the fact that this was his first offense as mitigating circumstances warranting a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case