THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ALPESHKUMAR RATILAL THAKOR — 184/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210002072026

Filing Number

184/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

184/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195001250688

Police Station

AGTHALA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ALPESHKUMAR RATILAL THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted Alpeshkumar Ratilal Thakor under IPC sections 279, 337, and 338 for operating a motorcycle without a valid license while under the influence of alcohol. The accused pleaded guilty and sought leniency citing his large family; however, the court imposed a fine of ₹1,000 and six days simple imprisonment, considering the severity of the offense and established sentencing principles while balancing judicial discretion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 184/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Alpeshkumar Ratilal Thakor under IPC sections 279, 337, and 338 for operating a motorcycle without a valid license while under the influence of alcohol. The accused pleaded guilty and sought leniency citing his large family; however, the court imposed a fine of ₹1,000 and six days simple imprisonment, considering the severity of the offense and established sentencing principles while balancing judicial discretion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case