THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs POCHUBEN W/O DASHRATBHAI THAKOR — 180/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210002032026

Filing Number

180/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

180/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996001260035

Police Station

AGTHALA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.POCHUBEN W/O DASHRATBHAI THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Pochuben W/O Dashratbhai Thakor (CC 180/2026) The court convicted the accused Pochuben Dashratbhai Vaghela (Thakor) under Section 264 IPC for a criminal offense and sentenced her to imprisonment of one month or a fine of Rs. 100, considering her poor socioeconomic circumstances, lack of prior criminal record, and family responsibilities as mitigating factors. The court applied lenient sentencing principles, imposing minimal punishment while emphasizing rehabilitation and societal reintegration as objectives of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 180/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Pochuben W/O Dashratbhai Thakor (CC 180/2026) The court convicted the accused Pochuben Dashratbhai Vaghela (Thakor) under Section 264 IPC for a criminal offense and sentenced her to imprisonment of one month or a fine of Rs. 100, considering her poor socioeconomic circumstances, lack of prior criminal record, and family responsibilities as mitigating factors. The court applied lenient sentencing principles, imposing minimal punishment while emphasizing rehabilitation and societal reintegration as objectives of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case