THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs GITABEN W/O HIRAJI TAHKOR — 176/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210001992026

Filing Number

176/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

176/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996001250634

Police Station

AGTHALA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GITABEN W/O HIRAJI TAHKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused Hiraji Tahkor under Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) for illicit liquor possession and granted him leniency considering mitigating factors—his impoverished economic status as the sole earner in his family and the absence of prior criminal history. The court sentenced him to imprisonment of Rs. 100 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default) instead of the mandatory minimum sentence, finding sufficient and special grounds to justify the reduced punishment in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 176/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused Hiraji Tahkor under Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) for illicit liquor possession and granted him leniency considering mitigating factors—his impoverished economic status as the sole earner in his family and the absence of prior criminal history. The court sentenced him to imprisonment of Rs. 100 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default) instead of the mandatory minimum sentence, finding sufficient and special grounds to justify the reduced punishment in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case