THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs HIRABHAI BHIKHABHAI MAKWANA — 172/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210001952026

Filing Number

172/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

172/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996001250649

Police Station

AGTHALA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HIRABHAI BHIKHABHAI MAKWANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court sentenced respondent Hirabhai Bhikhabhai Makwana to rigorous imprisonment for one year and a fine of Rs. 100 with an alternative of five days simple imprisonment under IPC Section 264, for offenses under Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1). The court applied the principle of sentencing discretion and imposed a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum, considering mitigating factors such as the accused's impoverished background, first offense, and status as the sole earning family member. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 172/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court sentenced respondent Hirabhai Bhikhabhai Makwana to rigorous imprisonment for one year and a fine of Rs. 100 with an alternative of five days simple imprisonment under IPC Section 264, for offenses under Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1). The court applied the principle of sentencing discretion and imposed a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum, considering mitigating factors such as the accused's impoverished background, first offense, and status as the sole earning family member. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case