THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRAVINBHAI PANCHABHAI THAKOR — 171/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210001942026

Filing Number

171/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

171/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996001260005

Police Station

AGTHALA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAVINBHAI PANCHABHAI THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: State of Gujarat v. Pravinbhai Panchabhai Thakor (CC 171/2026) The court convicted Pravinbhai Panchabhai Thakor under IPC Section 65(a) for a general offense. Considering mitigating factors—the accused's impoverished background, sole earning family member status, inability to pay fine, remorse, and first offense—the court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 100 fine instead of the statutory minimum, exercising discretion under judicial precedent permitting lenient sentencing where justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 171/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: State of Gujarat v. Pravinbhai Panchabhai Thakor (CC 171/2026) The court convicted Pravinbhai Panchabhai Thakor under IPC Section 65(a) for a general offense. Considering mitigating factors—the accused's impoverished background, sole earning family member status, inability to pay fine, remorse, and first offense—the court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 100 fine instead of the statutory minimum, exercising discretion under judicial precedent permitting lenient sentencing where justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case