THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs FULIBEN W/O JORAJI CHAMNAJI THAKOR — 169/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210001922026

Filing Number

169/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

169/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996001250614

Police Station

AGTHALA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.FULIBEN W/O JORAJI CHAMNAJI THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Fuliben W/O Joraji Chamnaji Thakor (CC 169/2026) The court convicted the accused Fuliben under IPC Section 65(A) (Bombay Prohibition Act) for a common offense. Considering the accused's voluntary guilty plea, impoverished economic status as the sole earning family member, genuine remorse, and first-time offender status, the court imposed lenient punishment: a fine of Rs. 100 instead of the prescribed higher penalty, with simple imprisonment for two days as alternative if fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 169/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Fuliben W/O Joraji Chamnaji Thakor (CC 169/2026) The court convicted the accused Fuliben under IPC Section 65(A) (Bombay Prohibition Act) for a common offense. Considering the accused's voluntary guilty plea, impoverished economic status as the sole earning family member, genuine remorse, and first-time offender status, the court imposed lenient punishment: a fine of Rs. 100 instead of the prescribed higher penalty, with simple imprisonment for two days as alternative if fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case