THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAMESHBHAI KALABHAI PARMAR — 168/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK210001912026
Filing Number
168/2026
Filing Date
09-02-2026
Registration No
168/2026
Registration Date
09-02-2026
Court
Taluka Court, Lakhni
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11996001250626
Police Station
AGTHALA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAMESHBHAI KALABHAI PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted Rameshbhai Kalabhai Parmar under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act for a common offense. Considering the accused's impoverished background, first-time offense, remorse, and status as the sole family earner, the court imposed lenient sentencing: a fine of Rs. 100 instead of the standard minimum, with 2 days simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid, and directed release of seized materials as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted Rameshbhai Kalabhai Parmar under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act for a common offense. Considering the accused's impoverished background, first-time offense, remorse, and status as the sole family earner, the court imposed lenient sentencing: a fine of Rs. 100 instead of the standard minimum, with 2 days simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid, and directed release of seized materials as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts